C2C absolute vs split number

Feel free to ask any question here
Post Reply
maricafranzini
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 7:15 am

C2C absolute vs split number

Post by maricafranzini »

Hi,
I've a question about C2C (cloud to cloud distance) functionality.
I compare two clouds and ask to CC to show me absolute value and split ones.
If I use NONE option, in local modeling page, the absolute value is correctly the norm of split numbers; but, when I use the other local models (least square plane, 2D 1/2 triangulation and height function) the absolute distance is not the norm of the three projected components (x,y,z). In this case, I do not understand which is the relation between absolute distance and split x,y,z value.

Can anyone help me?

Thanks

Marica
daniel
Site Admin
Posts: 7710
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 7:34 am
Location: Grenoble, France
Contact:

Re: C2C absolute vs split number

Post by daniel »

What version do you use? The last 2.7 one?
Daniel, CloudCompare admin
maricafranzini
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 7:15 am

Re: C2C absolute vs split number

Post by maricafranzini »

Not the last. I use version 2.6.1.
Marica
daniel
Site Admin
Posts: 7710
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 7:34 am
Location: Grenoble, France
Contact:

Re: C2C absolute vs split number

Post by daniel »

Strange. I didn't think it was possible to compute the split distances with the 2.6 version.

Can you try with the 2.7 version?
Daniel, CloudCompare admin
maricafranzini
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 7:15 am

Re: C2C absolute vs split number

Post by maricafranzini »

We are trying! I'll update you about new test.

Thank you!
Post Reply