Render to File Issue
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:32 pm
Hello everyone,
First of all I would like to thank for the development of CloudCompare as it is a great software for manipulating/analyzing point clouds. Recently, I think I have discovered something that is not giving me the desired outputs?
Problem 1:
I have this huge point cloud that weighs 3.5gb and is already rotated so to be parallel to the "set front view". The intent is to make a screenshot ("render to file") in order to have a sectioncut/elevation of the building. But when exporting the image (no matter what the "point size" or "zoom" is) it does not display every point of the point cloud.
To better explain here are some images:
A)screenshot to show the density of the point cloud . Note that point size is set to 5. B)render to file of the point cloud. Here, the point cloud has been segmented. The part that is more dense is the small segment. The rest of the point cloud, which is more sparse, is part of the bigger point cloud. In other words, I found that as the point cloud size increases the fewer points are taken into account for making the final image. Inversely, the smaller the point cloud the more points are represented. Is it due to hardware? Or is it something that I am not doing right?
I am running on 96gb RAM, AMD Radeon R9 200 series, 2x Xeon processor.
Thanks in advance,
João
First of all I would like to thank for the development of CloudCompare as it is a great software for manipulating/analyzing point clouds. Recently, I think I have discovered something that is not giving me the desired outputs?
Problem 1:
I have this huge point cloud that weighs 3.5gb and is already rotated so to be parallel to the "set front view". The intent is to make a screenshot ("render to file") in order to have a sectioncut/elevation of the building. But when exporting the image (no matter what the "point size" or "zoom" is) it does not display every point of the point cloud.
To better explain here are some images:
A)screenshot to show the density of the point cloud . Note that point size is set to 5. B)render to file of the point cloud. Here, the point cloud has been segmented. The part that is more dense is the small segment. The rest of the point cloud, which is more sparse, is part of the bigger point cloud. In other words, I found that as the point cloud size increases the fewer points are taken into account for making the final image. Inversely, the smaller the point cloud the more points are represented. Is it due to hardware? Or is it something that I am not doing right?
I am running on 96gb RAM, AMD Radeon R9 200 series, 2x Xeon processor.
Thanks in advance,
João